I realize that Aaron Sorkin (The Social Network, Moneyball) can’t write all the films, but I couldn’t help but think that The Ides of March would’ve greatly benefited from one of his famous rewrites. The film lacks his trademark verbal zing and insiderish authority, not to mention his gift for character development.
As it is, The Ides of March feels a bit like it’s doing an impression of a great film. It certainly has the dream cast—Ryan Gosling, George Clooney (who also directed), Philip Seymour Hoffman, and Paul Giamatti. (What? Daniel Day-Lewis wasn’t available?). And its setting—the corrupt world of primary politics—has produced more than its fair share of classics. But while the film is hardly a dud, it falls seriously short of greatness.
Gosling plays Stephen Myers, campaign press secretary for presidential candidate Governor Mike Morris (Clooney). Stephen is shrewd, but an idealist. He believes fully in Morris, who is a principled liberal in the manner of Barack Obama (although, as is often the case with Hollywood films about politics, Morris is way too liberal to actually win a general election: He’s a pacifist who also...




